| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
the bunk
requiem for a bro
Gender: 
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 6430
Status: User
Location: boston: "the city of angels"
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:08 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
in truth, you dont make a lot of wrestling-themed posts, but youve had a wrestling themed av/sig since, what, you joined? i wouldnt mind them if they werent, as i said, huge, annoying, and animated.
i also assume that i won all the other "debates", since you seem to be only arguing the most frivolous parts of my argument.
goddamn, i wish i wasnt so prone to arguing. ive wasted too much time on you. and i probably still will.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hooooomsar
Class-hole
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 3721
Status: User
Location: TARDVILLE
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Point A is probably right. This movie is a farce.
Point B is apparantly right. I wasn't aware that I'm not rebellious enough. We can't all be anti-trendy rebels. I wish I was extreme enough to disagree with the majority just because they're the majority. I have this nasty habit of forming my own opinions, rather than declaring that because the majority said something, it's instantly wrong.
_________________
I'M A TARD  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
the bunk
requiem for a bro
Gender:
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 6430
Status: User
Location: boston: "the city of angels"
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what the fuck? that wasnt my point. i was going to restate it here, but ill instead just say read it again, and try to understand what it is im actually saying (and no, it's not an "anti-trendy" remark), because if i restate what i said, youll probably take something from my new remark that wasnt intended to be interpreted that way and just dumb it down to name calling.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
the bunk
requiem for a bro
Gender:
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 6430
Status: User
Location: boston: "the city of angels"
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jesus christ, just get banned already.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sharp
Gender:
Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Posts: 5942
Status: User
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Seriously, Logan. Nobody likes you. Listen to Logan and get banned. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hooooomsar
Class-hole
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 3721
Status: User
Location: TARDVILLE
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sharp wrote: | | Seriously, Logan. Nobody likes you. Listen to Logan and get banned. |
Wanna think that one over and try it again? Don't strain yourself.
_________________
I'M A TARD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guy
Gender: 
Joined: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 872
Status: User
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only thing I'll say is that the animated wrestling pics ARE a little annoying. Which is why I blocked them.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hooooomsar
Class-hole
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 3721
Status: User
Location: TARDVILLE
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
_________________
I'M A TARD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
the bunk
requiem for a bro
Gender:
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 6430
Status: User
Location: boston: "the city of angels"
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hey guys why dont we talk about nacho libre
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hooooomsar
Class-hole
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 3721
Status: User
Location: TARDVILLE
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So far all the reports i've heard are conflicting. I've heard it was stupid, i've heard it has anchorman style humor, and I've heard it was terrible. I'm probably gonna see it next weekend.
_________________
I'M A TARD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guy
Gender:
Joined: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 872
Status: User
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hooooomsar wrote: | |
That's funny. And genius.
W/e.
It's not even an argument for me ot explain how much I don't like wrestling fans and for you to say how much you don't care, so let's not stretch this out for another page for no damn reason. Let's just agree to disagree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hoff
Gender:
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 1398
Status: User
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dead Leaves wrote: | | Let's just agree to disagree. |
hahahahaha that's a good one.
I mean, I lol'd. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hooooomsar
Class-hole
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 3721
Status: User
Location: TARDVILLE
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dead Leaves wrote: | | Hooooomsar wrote: | |
That's funny. And genius.
W/e.
It's not even an argument for me ot explain how much I don't like wrestling fans and for you to say how much you don't care, so let's not stretch this out for another page for no damn reason. Let's just agree to disagree. |
I don't like Bob Dylan fans.
Yeah, I know it doesn't make sense but neither does saying "I don't like wrestling fans".
Anyway. Nacho Libre. Who's actually seen it?
_________________
I'M A TARD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Christo
Gender:
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 1255
Status: User
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have.
Honestly, Jack Black gets on my nerves a little but as I said two pages ago, the movie had it's moments. It had a fair bit of Napoleon Dynamite-style humour but alot of it was Simpsons-y aswell (for lack of something better to compare it with).
It was better then I imagined it would've been.
Also, it annoyed me how Jack Black completely lost his accent when he sang.
_________________
You're a nut! You're crazy in the coconut! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hoff
Gender:
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 1398
Status: User
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I saw it today.
Better than expected, but not that great. Had it's moments, but was boring mostly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
