| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
the bunk requiem for a bro

Gender:  Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 6430 Status: User Location: boston: "the city of angels"
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
that's a champion review right there _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sharp

Gender:  Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 5942 Status: User
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank you sir I will take my twenty dollars now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dodger
Gender:  Joined: 06 May 2006 Posts: 2136 Status: User
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Christ, Sharp.
NO MY FAV BAND IS TOTALLY UNIQUE DON'T ARGUE
I'm not trying to start a flame war, Sharp. I did flame you, and I said as much. I called you retarded because you are most definitely wrong, and you'd have to be retarded not to see it. You said that Lordi and and GWAR were "not comparable". Let's see...
1. Monster costumes.
2. Songs about being monsters.
3. Theatrical live shows with pyrotechnics.
4. Hard rock / heavy metal music.
5. Badass metal-type logos.
There we go. I just compared them. I didn't say that Lordi sucked, or that they were better or worse than GWAR. I said that the two bands are similar, and they clearly are. Just because you love Lordi doesn't mean they're unique. Get over it and stop being such a blind fanboy. Lordi is similar to GWAR, Slipknot, and KISS.
Plus, Lordi and GWAR's music is not all that different. It never occurred to you that I might fucking own two Lordi albums, huh? Like, I bought them. At a store. I feel that I can safely say that Lordi's music comfortably fits into the realm of heavy metal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the bunk requiem for a bro

Gender:  Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 6430 Status: User Location: boston: "the city of angels"
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
this, or course, raises the question why the fuck are you wasting your time on sharp _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sharp

Gender:  Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 5942 Status: User
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dodger wrote: | Christ, Sharp.
NO MY FAV BAND IS TOTALLY UNIQUE DON'T ARGUE
I'm not trying to start a flame war, Sharp. I did flame you, and I said as much. I called you retarded because you are most definitely wrong, and you'd have to be retarded not to see it. You said that Lordi and and GWAR were "not comparable". Let's see...
1. Monster costumes.
2. Songs about being monsters.
3. Theatrical live shows with pyrotechnics.
4. Hard rock / heavy metal music.
5. Badass metal-type logos.
There we go. I just compared them. I didn't say that Lordi sucked, or that they were better or worse than GWAR. I said that the two bands are similar, and they clearly are. Just because you love Lordi doesn't mean they're unique. Get over it and stop being such a blind fanboy. Lordi is similar to GWAR, Slipknot, and KISS.
Plus, Lordi and GWAR's music is not all that different. It never occurred to you that I might fucking own two Lordi albums, huh? Like, I bought them. At a store. I feel that I can safely say that Lordi's music comfortably fits into the realm of heavy metal. |
I just don't get why you keep saying you don't want to start a flame war, and then keep trying to. Yes, they can be compared, they're both a style of hard rock, they both wear costumes. Perhaps I was off saying they can't be compared, it's not illegal to dislike criticism of something you like. I haven't however, been going into detail trying blindly and desperately to disprove your point, it's just that I've seen so many blind GWAR fans saying lordi is a complete ripoff of GWAR, that it starts to tick me off to an irrational point when they're compared at all. There. I did nothing to dispute your argument, I admitted my own faults, and I explained my behavior. If you're looking for a long argument, go elsewhere. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Homestarrunnernet Wastrel.
Gender:  Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 1355 Status: User
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sharp wrote: | | No.. For one: This is no longer the 80s. |
I just wanted to point out that you weren't born in the 80s.
Anyways, carry on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the bunk requiem for a bro

Gender:  Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 6430 Status: User Location: boston: "the city of angels"
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
sharp youre a retard _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sharp

Gender:  Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 5942 Status: User
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Homestarrunnernet wrote: | | Sharp wrote: | | No.. For one: This is no longer the 80s. |
I just wanted to point out that you weren't born in the 80s.
Anyways, carry on. |
No. I was born in the 70's.
Thirty and flirty everybody!
Regardless, I immerse myself in a lot of '80s culture. It's not the same as living in it, I'm sure, (Probably a hell of a lot better) but I get some understanding about some parts of it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dodger
Gender:  Joined: 06 May 2006 Posts: 2136 Status: User
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sharp wrote: | Perhaps I was off saying they can't be compared.
There. I did nothing to dispute your argument, I admitted my own faults, and I explained my behavior. |
That's all I wanted, Sharp: for you to face reality and not dismiss my opinion when you have no ground to stand on.
In other words, to quit being a retard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Seanie kid with the will to funk

Gender:  Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 3849 Status: User Location: montréal
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dodger wrote: |
for you to face reality and not dismiss my opinion when you have no ground to stand on.
|
I have just figured out why you used to fight with ITS all the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sharp

Gender:  Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 5942 Status: User
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dodger wrote: | | Sharp wrote: | Perhaps I was off saying they can't be compared.
There. I did nothing to dispute your argument, I admitted my own faults, and I explained my behavior. |
That's all I wanted, Sharp: for you to face reality and not dismiss my opinion when you have no ground to stand on.
In other words, to quit being a retard. |
...
People would dismiss your opinions less if you stopped calling them retards.
EDIT: Yeah, now I know how ITS feels. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hooooomsar Class-hole

Joined: 25 Mar 2006 Posts: 3721 Status: User Location: TARDVILLE
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Defending a non-argument? _________________ I'M A TARD  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Homestarrunnernet Wastrel.
Gender:  Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 1355 Status: User
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sharp wrote: | | dodger wrote: | | Sharp wrote: | Perhaps I was off saying they can't be compared.
There. I did nothing to dispute your argument, I admitted my own faults, and I explained my behavior. |
That's all I wanted, Sharp: for you to face reality and not dismiss my opinion when you have no ground to stand on.
In other words, to quit being a retard. |
...
People would dismiss your opinions less if you stopped calling them retards. |
I feel this is reinforcing his argument from a spectator standpoint. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the bunk requiem for a bro

Gender:  Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 6430 Status: User Location: boston: "the city of angels"
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
i feel anything sharp says rakes in the lols _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sharp

Gender:  Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 5942 Status: User
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hooooomsar wrote: | | Defending a non-argument? |
I can't help it, dammit! I blame the testosterone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|